Three Witnesses, Part 1

Matthew 7:15  “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves”

(note)  why did Jesus say this?  Because He KNEW

Acts 20:29  “For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock”

(note)  Jesus KNEW that there would be those who would attack the flock and try to undermine THE faith by undermining the TRUTH.  There are many ways this has been attempted, but I want to look at one way this has been done by undermining the first witness – the Bible

(note)  John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson and spoke scathingly about the Jesuits and feared they would enter the country in swarms and condemned them by and saying

“if ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell, it is this society of Loyola’s”

Abraham Lincoln himself said “it is not against the Americans of the south, alone, that I am fighting.  It is more against the Pope of Roam and his perfidious Jesuits and their blind and blood-thirsty slaves that we have to defend ourselves” 

(note)  do you think the dragon would leave alone the country that protected the woman in the wilderness?  Do you think he would simply resign himself to the fact that there was a safe haven for God’s church or do you think he would redouble his efforts to infiltrate and change the national stronghold of God’s church?  He is not one to lay down and give up . . . his life is on the line!

“The missionary program of the Vatican, doubt it who may, embraces the conversion of Britain and the United States of America and through them, the subjugation of the whole world.”  Report of the Centenary Conference of Protestant Missions of the World, Exeter Hall, London 1888

(note)  does this not fit in with Bible prophecy?  The beast with “lamb like horns that spake as a dragon”.  My point here is not to get into prophecy, but to point out the method which Babylon uses . . . INFILTRATION and DECEPTION Remember Matt 7:15

The Jesuit oath “My son, heretofore, you have been taught to act the dissembler.  Among the reformers, to be a reformer, among the Calvinists to be a Calvinist, among the protestants to be a protestant, and obtaining their confidence to seek even to preach from their pulpits.  You have been taught your duty as a spy to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of . . . heretics of every class and character as well as among the schools and universities”

(note)  the plan of the society was to overthrow the Bible based education of the protestants

Charles Spurgen, speaking of preachers who are actually Jesuit infiltrators, said “they keep back a portion of the Gospel . . . having studied in the devil’s new Jesuitical college”

(note)  they can teach truth so long as they don’t teach ALL the truth!  I have seen so many corporate pastors teach truth only to fall on their theological faces when it comes to the conclusion.  If someone gives you a car but it is missing one wheel, does it do you any good?

(note)  The Jesuit’s MAIN purpose was to do away with Protestantism and the BEST way of doing this was to do away with the Protestant’s Bible!  Protestantism spread MAINLY because of the printed Bible (in fact it was said of Tyndale to Popery “I will have the common plow boy to know more of the Scriptures than you) and the Jesuits desired to reverse this with a FALSE bible.

John 8:31-32  “Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”

Continuing in the word = discipleship = knowledge of the truth = freedom

Continuing in a corrupted word = corrupted discipleship = corrupted knowledge of the truth = corrupted freedom

(note)  If your foundation is not level and square then the whole building will be out of level and out of square so when you corrupt the word of God, you the corrupt WHOLE building of truth!

It was said of someone who was supposed to of overheard a leading Jesuit say “Then the Bible, that serpent which, with head erect and eyes flashing, threatens us with its venom, shall be changed again into a rod as soon as we are able to sieze it.  For you know but too well that for three centuries past, this cruel asp has left us no repose.  You well know with what folds it entwines us and with what fangs it gnaws us”   The Jesuit Conspiracy:  The Secrete Plan of the Order

(note)  Codex Sinnaticus (from St Cathrin’s monastery at the base of the supposed Mt Sinai with 14,800 “corrections” in it and the Pope expressed his “highest appreciation of the publication”) and Codex Vaticanus (from the Vatican library) in the 1880’s and were said to be “more ancient than that used for the KJV”.  But I would like to point out the fact that BOTH of these manuscripts came from the very bowls of the anti-Christ power (even their names reveal this fact).  Do you actually believe that the VERY power that is drunken with the blood of the saints and that wants to destroy Protestantism would have not ALTERED these documents?!  Do you REALLY want to trust that?  Do you REALLY want to trust the truth to their filter?  These two documents ultimately support Babylon’s doctrines and the corrupt Latin Vulgate which is what the catholic church originally used to support its doctrines prior to Erasamus unequivocally proving its corruptions.

Enter Wescott and Hort and their “revised Greek text” or “critical text” which come from the Codex Sinnaticus and Codex Vaticanus used for the “functional equivalence” or PARAPHRASE (what this means is:  “we will tell you what the Bible says” – does that remind you of the dark ages?)

(note)  Wescott and Hort did not believe in the sonship of Jesus, heaven, hell, miracles, etc.  Would you put a thief in charge of a bank?  Would you put a fox to guarding the henhouse?  What do you think is going to happen when you put an unbeliever in charge of handling the word of God?  Check out Ezekiel 44:7-8 to see what God has to say about such things

Romans 10:17  “So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God”. 

(note)  The word of God is thought inspired not word inspired and paraphrases TELL you what the thoughts were based on their OWN interpretation and they do not allow you to decide for YOURSELF what the thoughts were.  On this line, you will hear me quote a version other than the KJV sometimes, but I only quote them when I believe they are in agreement with the KJV and are saying it in a clearer way.

Mark 16:16  “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned” 

(note)  Why have I quoted this verse?  What does this have to do with the validity of the Textus Receptus?  EVERYTHING!!!  It is claimed that the Codex sinnaticus and vaticanus (early 4th century) are “older” than Textus Receptus (mid 4th century) and therefore more reliable (even though evidence suggests the vaticanus is actually from the 15th century and the sinnaticus is actually from the 19th century written by Simonities).  The “newer” versions of the Bible do not have Mark 16:16 or they say “the older manuscripts do not have this verse”.  Here is what is VERY interesting.  The Anti-Nicene Fathers were pre 4th century QUOTE Mark 16:16!!!!  This shows the Textus Receptus as ACTUALLY the older set of manuscripts.

John 1:18 KJV  “No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him”

John 1:18 NAS  “No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him

Ephesians 3:9 KJV  “And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ”

(note)  Wescott and Hort editions delete “by Jesus Christ”.  These versions seek to do away with the sonship of Jesus and lower Him to a divine spirit possesing a created human body.  Thus Babylon and her daughters can conclude that the Son of God did not TRULY die on the cross, but only a human body did, thus doing away with the sacrifice.  This, both triunitarians and Arians (JW), agree

An RSV was given to the Pope and “the Pope accepted the copy as a significant step in furthering ecumenical relations among the churches”  English Translations of the Bible, Today and Tomorrow by Bruce M Metzger

MAIN POINT:  The Protestant movement was spread mainly by the printing of the Bible, so the Jesuits must corrupt Protestantism by spreading a corrupt bible.

How many religions claim the Bible?  How many religions claim the KJV?

Deuteronomy 19:15  “at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established”

(note)  in my studies, I have found 3 witnesses.  All three witnesses confirm and uplift the other two witnesses making for an unshakable foundation.